The gems of a draft cla s aren't always first-round picks, and the picks that disappoint aren't always the third-day fliers. takes a look at the best and worst picks of each team in the NFL with respect to value and fit rather than overall talent, here focusing on the NFC North.Chicago BearsBest: WR , Round 1 (No. 7 overall) The have hitched their offensive wagon to , and if it's ever going to roll at peak performance, an abundance of weapons surrounding the interception-prone quarterback is a must. White was brought in to replace 's productivity, and he could do that and then some as a rookie.Worst: RB , Round 4 (No. 106 overall) In a physical division like the NFC North, Langford isn't a very physical rusher. If the are counting on Langford to be a third-down specialist, he Phillip Gaines Jersey might be fine. But if they're looking for more, he could disappoint. from Minnesota would have been a better pick from a toughne s standpoint.Detroit LionsBest: RB , Round 2 (No. 54 overall) The former Nebraska star was the fourth running back chosen in the draft, and the got good value for him in the latter half of the round. He explodes through the smallest of holes and can catch the ball exceptionally well. Fumbling is a concern on Abdullah, but if he proves trustworthy in securing the ball, the will put it in his hands a lot.Worst: FB , Round 5 (No. 168 overall) Burton will have to make the team as a special-teams contributor and probably won't offer much to the ' offense. He is a solid pa s catcher but not an especially good blocker. Even in an H-back role that would emphasize his receiving skills, he'd still have to be a solid blocker at the next level -- and he might not be up to that task. His scouting report projection? Undrafted.Green Bay PackersBest: DB , Round 1 (No. 30 overall) The addre sed a need with Randall and got a versatile talent who should make as much of an impact as anyone picked Joe Thomas Jersey late in Round 1. The will give him a look at cornerback, but the beauty of this pick is that Randall can move to safety, and potentially flourish there, if cornerback isn't his calling. The are building a dynamic young secondary for the future with back-to-back first-round picks the last two years, plus a 2015 second-rounder (). Randall figures to be a major factor in the youth movement.Worst: WR , Round 3 (No. 94 overall) Montgomery didn't look like the same player last year as he did as a junior in 2014, and the result was a slip in the draft. In a deep group of receivers at the , he didn't stand out as much as a couple of guys picked after him, including East Carolina's and . He's strong, physical and can get the extra yard to move the chains, but his penchant for drops is a big concern.Minnesota VikingsBest: OL , Round 4 (No. 110 overall) This just might turn out to be the steal of the draft if the concerns on Clemmings -- from medical reports to his raw, unpolished technique -- are overcome quickly and easily. Although Clemmings has the frame and athleticism to play left tackle, his lack of college experience demands that he stay on the right side for the time being. As a third-day pick, Clemmings represented an incredible value for the .Worst: DE , Round 3 (No. 88 overall) Hunter has all the physical tools to be a quality pa s rusher and the took him about where he was projected to fall. But he's not much of a finisher (1.5 sacks last year) and as a rookie, he'll be more of a developmental player than a productive one. He does play the run effectively, which a lot of pa s rushers can't claim, but if he doesn't develop as a pa s rusher in the NFL, he likely won't justify a top-100 pick.Follow Chase Goodbread on Twitter .